If PvP entities even individually decided, "Hey, we're not blobbing everyone to death anymore" and figured out ways that worked for them to implement that, well, it might be slow to change their reputation, but eventually word will get out, "Hey, these guys just want a fight, not to pad their killboard," and smaller groups would engage. We wouldn't see wormhole empires arise, become powerful, revered, and respected only to have them have to leave wormhole space. Each time it happens, we loose a little of our collective soul as a people.... It is sad.

Consider, would you rather be able to roll into many holes and get small skirmishes and be able to show your self openly saying, "Fight at x planet and x moon" and people actually show up, or would you rather every single person hide when they see your corp? I'd rather be known to be honorable and have people willing to engage me, even if it means splitting up my fleets and having them roam different parts of space, possibly loosing a few fights I'd otherwise win.

You know Rek, if there was an award for missing the point, you'd have to buy a bigger house just so that you can fit all your awards in your spare rooms.

let me try spell it out one last time.
it isnt about arranged fights or keeping numbers small or anything game related. It's about mentality and attitude.
you, and others, keep saying there's no conflict in WHs, no reason to fight. well, youre wrong.
i can't make is any clearer for you. youre wrong, because people like me and the op and others keep telling you that there are conflict drivers, that there are reasons to fight and that WHs are just fine the way they are.

if you dont have any drive to pvp in WHs then why are you living in WHs? and i'm being serious with this question.
why live in space you dont like and clearly dont enjoy being in?
If i hated WHs as much as you clearly do I would have moved out years ago and gone done something else.

i think you really need to consider if you want to be here. if not, that's fine. wspace is definitely NOT for everyone, im not saying it is, but it provides a very unique gaming environment that you seem very eager to make closer to kspace.
people like you saying there's no reason to do anything in Whs or people like herrbert saying scanning is boring and that WHs should be anoms doesnt help wspace at all.
the best case scenario is people just ignore you, the worst is that CCP listen to you and ruin Whs for those of us who actually like them.

PS: hoping that smaller corps one day 'grow up to be a competitor' is exactly the wrong attitude im talking about. Ive met many really good small corps and likewise many really awful large corps. size has very little to do with quality and in WHs space, size past a certain point only adds chaff.

Do you really have no doubts that CCP won't mess up if they make changes or add new content to WH's?

What we have in WH's now is more by luck than judgement on CCP's part - it was only intended as a place for exploration, it is the player base that made WH's a new way of life - that was never forseen by CCP.

Depends whether you're a cup half full or half empty kind of guy, but I'd rather keep what we have now, than gamble that CCP would add any meaningful new content without messing something else up whilst doing so.

So you couldn't beat his argument and went KB trolling tsk tsk whats next insult his mom jokes?

If you don't like being blobbed by 30 T3s with 40 Guardians and caps, then stay out of wh space that has 3bil holes and large groups. Move to c2 space where you get fights on a smaller scale that can be just as fun. Contrary to what a handful of idiots say in deep wh space, low class wormholes are a blast.

You were literally on the last roam with us..? If Chitsa's fun roams are killing wormhole space, and you sincerely feel it is detrimental, why the f*** are you joining his roams?



lol, what?

FYI - You say we are evicting people that don't play our way, and you come on the forums to advocate CCP change the game because people aren't playing the game your way. Who is at risk of being more damaging to the community?